Peterborough’s nappy app

Yesterday, inspired by comments about walking by Ch Ali Shan, I smashed a personal best (PB). I completed a hyper leaflet drop. I knew it would be tough, so I decided to use a smart phone app called mapmywalk.
I was thinking I could picture my leaflet drop to produce something shareable with the team (we’d just broken all our leafletting records over the weekend) and that this would be fun for me on a tough day and we might end up with something we could all use. I don’t go nuts for personal performances or PBs (well, not usually!) but the mapping bit could turn out to be extremely useful. But I’d already set off, before deciding to give it a go and downloaded the app on the go. (I wouldn’t do that usually.) So I began with an inaccuracy: a bit of real walk not covered by the walk being built by the app.
Doing this properly, you’d have to decide: what is the start of the drop: where you start delivering, or your home?
As I went, I found good things to snap:

20160418_165645
Although this pathway needs the no cycle sign and the dreadful barriers removed, I loved the blossom framed by the archway.
20160418_165936
I passed some stunningly beautiful gardens

And you can’t go anywhere in Peterborough now without finding ghastly things on pavements. The stuff we can’t live with and before it has done a job is no longer worth the cost of disposal to people who value what cash they can get. I now report there and then, using: FixMyStreet, which has much more functionality than MyPeterborough which, despite being a very poor and unresponsive (i.e. the app developers don’t respond to user queries) app, is the only one listed on the council’s website. Here are some of the horrible things walkers come across every day in Peterborough:

 146098383657114609828568741460885629706

You can pause the “walk” on the app and resume, so as keep the walk part look like an actual walk and the stop and do things or chat to people not look like part of the “walk”. If it were possible to do this correctly, the app would give you an accurate average speed for when you were really walking. It sounds easy, but every time I did something like  reporting a discarded pct and then the mouldy chair without remembering to pause the app each time, there would be an impact on my “walk’s” average speed and my results would get less and less true.
In fact, yesterday, I think as I pressed resume, just after the mouldy chair by the bus stop and the public toilets which have been closed for over a decade, I lifted my head, ready to go and a massive training lorry swung swung into a small tree in front of my eyes. There are moments when apps are not even in your consciousness.
But once or twice I also forgot to resume until I was several hundred yards from where I’d stopped. This error is funny because the app creates something which looks like a flight path on the “walk”. When I did this and turned a corner, the app would draw a flight path straight through a house. And when I stopped in The Crown for a coffee (yes, they do), the app stayed there long after I’d set off again, sat and maybe dozing in front of the fire, improving my average as I walked on and on without using any time, and waiting for another short flight.
I wonder if a pedometer rather than a route mapper would have worked better for me, or maybe one which does both? Because unless you are delivering to homes with very long driveways, the app doesn’t see the little sideways ducks and dives from the pavement to the letterboxes. That is OK if what you are mapping is an ordinary walk. But a leaflet drop is something else.
People look down on leafletting or assume (sometimes at their peril) that it is easy. In fact it isn’t easy: it is very physical and the best footwear would probably be cross trainers. It isn’t just the walking: it is the sharp turns round gates, bending down to letterboxes, some of them at ground level. Leafletting certainly gives your whole body a workout. This is why councillors ask people to help them deliver and promise them they can shrink their waistlines. This promise is actually true. It is also hard on the knees, because if you walk fast your body needs to change direction fast.Which app best describes this sort of activity?
As for today, I might write a bit and check on my seedlings or if my legs can cope, I might pop down to the Real Nappy Library, who are doing their bit to reduce landfilled nappies in Central Park today till 2pm.

12998416_1096515980405384_3217673519463045018_o

Spot the Difference

2016 04 16 14:47 at the beginning of a leafletting session. Not reported: with a crowd and didn't want to hold people up.
2016 04 16 14:47 at the beginning of a leafletting session. Not reported: with a crowd and didn’t want to hold people up.
2016 04 16 18:13 Now alone and on my way home from leafletting, thought it worth posting a report on my lovely Fix My Street app. Could not believe what I saw. Decided to post the first picture on my Fix My Street app.
2016 04 16 18:13 Now alone and on my way home from leafletting, thought it worth posting a report on my lovely Fix My Street app. Could not believe what I saw. Decided to post the first picture on my Fix My Street app.
Click here to find Fix My Street which works on a smart phone.
Click here to find Fix My Street which works extremely well on a smart phone.

Air Pollution and Peterborough City Council

Picture is at http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/aqma/lis… and the status of the Air Quality Management Area (two small areas in Whittlesey) has not changed since 2007 when the breach of legal limits was notified to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA).

Peterborough City Council’s other progress on air pollution since then:

Council has never had a public information campaign to stop domestic and commercial burning of landfill, construction and commercial wastes, which is particularly prevalent in high housing turnover areas close to the railway station. Smoke and smog affect visitors’ perceptions of the city as they step onto the platform and air quality has a serious and ongoing impact on residents’ health and wellbeing. Many people living in the city have actually forgotten what fresh air smells like: they are no longer aware they are living in smoggy conditions: they simply don’t smell the smoke any more. These fires (many of them illegal) are set in the evening, just as council officers go home and since they are usually “safe” (i.e. someone is supervising the fire and it isn’t getting out of control) the fire brigade is not required to take action.
Council decided to approve, construct and launch (2016) its very own landfill waste incinerator with Cllr Kreling (on the planning committee at the time of approval) observing that if she couldn’t see anything coming out of the stack (the planning committee was taken on a tour of a similar monster), nothing was coming out. The council has never agreed to and is not live streaming data about its emissions from the stack.
Peterborough Renewable Energy Limited who were the first to propose an incinerator for the city did agree to live stream their emissions data on their website. But this is not the incinerator which has gone live.
The Chair of the Planning Committee, Councillor for East Ward, the ward with both planned incinerators sitting in it, offered to throw Richard Olive and me out of the council chamber She couldn’t throw us out because she couldn’t find a bailiff. But she was perfectly able to make a lousy decision without listening to evidence. For me, this was my introduction to the realities of politics in Peterborough. Most people have a vague sense of trust in their elected representatives. I lost whatever tiny bit I had left that day.
Between then and now council decided to knock down and pulverise numbers of large buildings made of brick, cement and plaster (Thomas Deacon School and several other predecessor-to-PFI schools, Bridge House, Peterborough District Hospital & assorted buildings on site). No dust suppression in place during the works and no coverage of the remaining mountains of dust (I observed the 20 ft high mountain of grey dust next to Aldermans Drive yesterday: 14th March 2016).
The Junction of Taverners Road with Bourges Boulevard is close to and downwind of the pile of pulverised sky scraper hospital and is also in a high density residential area. This junction is now close to breaching traffic pollution limits and that is according to official monitors. Are we surprised? Hardly. Cough Cough.
In London it has been shown that official monitoring is significantly understating the true state of affairs: http://cleanair.london/?s=monitorin…
People feel there is nothing they can do. But there are a few things.
  • More people need to observe democracy in action, even if it does mean risking getting thrown out of meetings. The dishonour of getting thrown out is not yours.
  • We could choose not to reelect councillors who fail to help improve air quality and who drive themselves around in heavy overpowered diesel vehicles.
  • We could vote in councillors who don’t drive. Or who drive electric, hybrid and low emissions vehicles. The importance of leadership cannot be overstated.
  • We could vote in councillors who understand that a 20mph speed limit in Peterborough’s residential streets would make cycling and walking pleasanter and would reduce the number of journeys taken by car.
  • We could find a real time air pollution app which relies on independent air monitoring and which works in Peterborough, so that we are not obliged to rely solely on council owned data.
  • The council could live stream its incinerator emissions and on street air pollution monitoring data on its website. If it is proud of what it is doing, there should be no qualms in showing off its achievements.

incineration decision: a first response

unofficial poster

Yesterday I wrote to my ward councillors.  Today I opened an email, sent last night at 20:51.   My first response!  Here it is:

“I have evaluated all your points & have complete confidence in the Council to do the right thing. If you had your way, we would all be living in caves.

Cllr Pam Kreling”

Who is she?  Here she is.  (and the email address she used to respond!)  This is one of my ward councillors, and she serves on no fewer than eight council committees, including Planning and Environmental Protection, Audit and, of all things: Strong and Supportive Communities.

incineration decision: letter to ward councillors

unofficial poster

Today I wrote in the following terms to my ward councillors, copying in my MP.

mass burn incinerator for household waste

I invite your comments on how you have protected the interests of the residents of my ward and of the city in the years since 2007 in this matter.

Should the council reconsider what it is doing: What would the costs of pulling out of this contract be today?  And tomorrow (assuming it is signed tomorrow)?

Have you checked whether or not the council considered options other than incineration?  What evidence of careful consideration of other options are you relying on?  Are you aware that the council has been consistently challenged on this since 2007, (and possibly earlier)?

Are you aware that the business cases for incineration in general and for this particular incinerator are both now being challenged as unsafe (the economy and the market having changed substantially)?  Have you considered the financial impact on council tax payers should these cautions turn out to be well founded? And that if the business performs as badly as expected are you aware of the likely impact on recycling, too?

Has the contract been set up in such a way that it can attract structural or grant funding?  Or has it been set up in such a way that it is ineligible?

Are you aware of the total cost of this contract?  Figures of £76M and £80M have been quoted recently in the Peterborough Evening Telegraph for the capital costs alone.  Is that figure current?  What are the overall 30 year costs for this project?  Is it acceptable that this information is still not in the public domain?  Is it acceptable that innocent readers of their local paper might assume that this figure is the total cost of the project?

Are you aware that the council is deliberately choosing out of date technology and describing it as “tried and tested”?  (the information on technology is still not in the public domain).

Are you aware that the council might be comparing the energy recovery of its own plant with Scandinavian examples?  If so are you aware that in Scandinavia (which is used to colder weather and historically much more aware of the importance of insulation and energy security) high performance hot water supply grids are planned in (eg for swimming pools or district heating).  Peterborough has not planned a supply grid and has not explained who will buy energy and power generated by this incinerator.  Have you seen an example of the output and recovery figures from either Peterborough’s as planned and have you compared that with an operational equivalent in Scandinavia and an operational equivalent in the UK (local campaigners are finding that those in the UK can’t sell their power).

Are you aware that the UK’s statutory regulatory regime for air pollution (in which the council has placed its trust) is widely regarded as unfit for purpose?  The Health Protection Agency is about to undertake research into whether or not it can substantiate the assurances and claims it has been making and upon which the Environment Agency and numerous councils have historically relied.   Is the council aware of the potential damage it could do to its own Environment Capital “aspiration” if, as widely expected, it can’t?

Do you know enough about air pollution and monitoring in the city?  Does Peterborough monitor anything other than road traffic?  Where are the monitoring stations and are they in the right places?  What regime is planned for when the incinerator is operational?

Have you considered the social, health and cost impacts on the city of a mass burn incinerator in an area with very high (and rising) levels of social deprivation?

Are you aware that a new incinerator on an industrial site in Fletton is operating and is apparently making people ill, but that the council has not done anything about it,  and that not one person amongst the “officers’ panel” and members present at the Sustainable Growth and Environment Capital Scrutiny Committee Call in Meeting on 29th August was equipped to advise the ward councillor who asked about this problem in his ward?  I understand that the ward councillor had been told by the Environment Agency that it was a matter for the council.  As a member of the public I witnessed that not a single person actually knew how to deal with this relatively small problem – nobody offered to look into it or explain who the ward councillor should talk to, if it wasn’t the Environment Agency.  This is despite the presence of senior council officers and (at least) three lawyers.

Are you satisfied with the monitoring and regulation of pollution in the city?

Please can Richard Olive have answers to the questions which Peterborough Friends of the Earth has asked the council on this matter?

Can you write NONE against – or otherwise provide detail of any personal, family or party interest you have had, have or are likely to have – in any of the following:

  •  the council’s Energy Services Company?
  • “Blue Sky”?
  • this sector?
  • this decision?

I look forward to hearing from you, etc.