Philippa and the judge – your feedback

Update 1:   Petition to free Philippa

My last post, published yesterday was written the previous day, and was about the jailing of a depressed woman called Philippa.

In response to the jailing of Philippa on Wednesday, Andy Harley raised a petition. I signed this yesterday and am asking my readers to sign and share it as widely as possible within Peterborough please. 

You can copy paste this into your browser to get to the petition: https://www.change.org/p/rt-hon-amber-rudd-pc-mp-release-philippa-fallowfield-from-prison-her-only-crime-is-struggling-with-depression

Update 2:   The two men who died between Yaxley and Farcet

My blog was partly about the alienating effect of cars and our road infrastructure and understanding why car parks and bridges over roads are chosen by suicidal (women, most often). As I wrote another story was breaking: the one about the car which killed two men walking along a local road. You know as a story breaks when it will be big, especially when there is briefcase involved, with a huge amount of cash in it and the next thing it was all over our television screens. But let’s ignore the big police blokes chasing big naughty blokes story and look at the underlying story. The one about the road. Because this location caused actual cries of pain on social media.

Turns out there is an old story, from two years ago, in fact. It involves another death on exactly the same stretch of road. I’m sure you will want to read it.

I received one comment (not on my blog, unfortunately): “Until the Highways Authority and their Highways Engineers face prosecution for corporate manslaughter for failing to address the obvious risk of death in circumstances such as these, nothing will change. Presently, they can, [and do], pretend to the fiction there is no risk until someone gets killed. As it is, the chances of anyone in the highways department accepting any personal or corporate responsibility are about the same as those that you will be bitten by a daffodil.”

He was just addressing the deaths of the two men, possibly not even having read the two year old story about another death. But he would presumably argue that there would have been an equally good case for prosecution then: two years ago. If he is right, then what is the strength of that case now that two more deaths have occurred? Surely, overwhelming.

The Peterborough judiciary has managed to jail Philippa. Think about it.

Which begs the question of who could be prosecuted.

Another friend blamed Peterborough City Council. I’d assumed when I wrote my last post that this patch of road was outside the city council boundary, and I was just about to correct him. But I thought I’d check my facts first. And this is what I found. The white patch is Peterborough Unitary Authority’s area. The orange bit is in Huntingdonshire and it looks as if the accident happened on the patch of road which runs along the boundary. Both orange and white patches sit within the constituency of North West Cambridgeshire.

farcet-and-yaxley-electoral-boundary

I will of course (somewhat unusually!) be sharing this particular post with the police.

Meanwhile, the only person in a position to bang the appropriate heads together, it seems to me, is Shaliesh Vara MP. He does not make himself available to me via social media (for me that means that he doesn’t do twitter) and I’m not in his constituency, so I’m not entitled to talk to him. So I won’t be sharing this post with him: I can’t. You might like to do that.

A grassy walk in Peterborough

20160608_151516
Social media lit up in Peterborough last week and the topic was grass on a recreation field which had grown to one metre tall. So on Wednesday when Sue said shall we go for a walk in the Boardwalks? I thought: I really need to switch off and there could be some grass there! And indeed: lots of different kinds of grasses, with seed heads blowing about in the wind. You can watch the dance of the seed heads as the wind makes huge ripples across the meadow. 
20160608_152316
This is the entrance to the boardwalks, I am wondering how high this grass is and how much is  reeds and sedges and which is which. I don’t know my grasses.
20160608_153304
Recent very heavy rain has damaged the boardwalk, which was built in the 80s. This marshy area is a tiny patch of an important flood plain for the river Nene. By absorbing and retaining river and rainwater upstream soft squidgy places like this help to protect the city. Fit people can cross the boardwalk here, but please be very very careful.

20160608_152717 20160608_152739 20160608_152752 20160608_152811 20160608_152909 20160608_152914 20160608_152933 20160608_153613

20160608_153832

20160608_153852
Might be three quarters of a pint of water in there with all sorts floating in it.
20160608_155416
Lovely fuzzy teasels. Here we say goodbye to the Boardwalk.

20160608_154058 20160608_154109 20160608_154520

20160608_161308
A large grey heron with wings spread out, presumably to dry. Looks like a weird sculpture from a distance. I was just about to get the perfect shot from much closer up, but pushing our bikes along, we startled it, and off it went. (We’d cycled to get to the boardwalks and were now back on our bikes.).
20160608_162434
Found this not so delightful plant very close to the city centre.  This is Japanese Knotweed. It is on the verge of Henry Penn walk, north Nene embankment. I have emailed the council and Railworld to find out who this patch of land belongs to: I am guessing it belongs to the council.

 

 

The almost invisible Holdich Motion

The Motion which was not properly discussed at last night’s Extraordinary General Meeting in Peterborough was this:
Ferris motion
Ferris motion

The full text reads as follows:

EXTRAORDINARY COUNCIL

AGENDA ITEM No. 3

13 APRIL 2016

PUBLIC REPORT

MOTIONS ON NOTICE

The following notice of motion has been received in accordance with the Council’s Standing Order 13.1:

1. Motion from Councillor Ferris, Councillor Fower, Councillor Johnson, Councillor Knowles, Councillor Murphy, Councillor Sandford and Councillor Shaheed

Council notes the announcement by the Chancellor of a devolution deal for the East in his Budget on 16 March; but regrets that the deal, in its current form, is not acceptable to this Council.

Council requests that the Chief Executive write to the Secretary of State for Local Government to bring this resolution to his attention.

The proposed East Anglia Devolution Agreement can be found at the following link:

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/508115/The _East_Anglia_Devolution_Agreement_FINAL_with_signatures_and_logos.pdf

A hard copy of the document will be available in each Group Room.”

But this was not debated. Instead:

The wishy washy “Holdich Amendment” was passed.

You wouldn’t pick up what happened if you just watched the BBC News at 10pm (which I did and which Cambridge City Council members may have done). And if you looked for what follows on the council’s website, you wouldn’t find it (as I write).
Holdich Amendment not included Website at 10:15 16:04:14
Holdich Amendment not included screen shot at 10:10 on 16:04:14
The council did publish it on its Twitter profile: ***

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

The ruling Conservative Party’s Holdich Amendment was discussed and voted FOR. It thus becoming the substantive motion and the only item which could be voted on. This removed any opportunity to discuss the original motion. It also positioned the council as unhappy, but wishing to remain in the conversation. At least one councillor believes that the city would have been excluded from discussions on the “proposed East Anglia Devolution Agreement” #ToryDevolution #EasternPowerhouse or what I think it is: #PseudoDevolution had it voted FOR the Ferris Motion.

 

EGM PCC 16 04 13

Holdich amendment
Holdich amendment
The council published this, but only on Twitter at 7.15pm last night (the meeting began at 7pm). The council has not published this, which is the Order Paper and which shows how the Amendment took precedence over the Motion. I believe it was highly discourteous to Cllr Ferris, the author of the motion to reveal it to him only at c 9.30 on the same day, especially since most people know he holds down a full time job as well as his councillor role.
Cllr Chris York and (I think) Cllr Yasmeen Maqbool did not make the meeting and didn’t send their apologies. The other absent councillors are listed below on my annotated Order Paper.
Nobody asked for the vote to be recorded, so electors cannot identify (nor could I) who voted for what on the second vote.

Peterborough hustings venues

This is a list of publicly owned (that means we the public own them) venues which are made available by statute free of charge by the city council for people to hold hustings in.   Venues for Hustings – for Candidates 2015

Stewart Jackson, Darren Bisby-Boyd and Chris Ash at Thomas Deacon Academy parliamentary hustings 15th April 2015.  This hustings was held in a large auditorium filled with Kings School and TDA sixth formers, but was also livecast internally to several hundred students.  I don't know if the video was recorded as well.
Stewart Jackson, Darren Bisby-Boyd and Chris Ash at Thomas Deacon Academy parliamentary hustings 15th April 2015. This hustings was held in a large auditorium filled with Kings School and TDA sixth formers, but was also livecast internally to several hundred students. I don’t know if the video was recorded as well.

Peterborough’s best hustings are often held in churches or schools.  These can be public or closed events.  Hustings they can be held anywhere and by any organisation.  A school event is particularly interesting: because children often see politics as something which only happens on the television or on the radio.  You are never too young to vote.  You are never too young to debate a issue.

The person hosting the hustings will probably need a candidate to apply for one of these venues.  The legislation (statute) governing this provision is the Representation of the People Act.

This hustings will happen later this week and there are rules (below the picture) about how to ask a question.  The organisation of the hustings is up to the host.

Peterborough Parish Church hustings to take place on Friday 24th April at 7:30
Peterborough Parish Church hustings to take place on Friday 24th April at 7:30

Click here for further details about the St Johns hustings

Haddon Hustings 18 April 2015 Nick Thulbourn, Nicola Day, George Martin (chairing) & Nick Sandford

I have never attended a hustings which got out of hand (close, but the well behaved sixth formers and their teachers worked hard to persuade candidates perhaps not to resort to fisticuffs).  A calm, friendly and firm person in the chair will help ensure a hustings keeps its hair on.  However the history of violence and intimidation within and working against the British democratic process is substantial and centuries old. This is well understood by parliament itself.  So to help keep things peaceful and calm, legislation makes a police presence available to hustings organisers if they feel they need one.  A very important, but perhaps not well understood statutory duty of the police is to uphold the democratic process, of which the hustings form a very important important part.

Peterborough Pensioners Hustings 2014
Peterborough Pensioners Hustings 2014


First Spalding Road. Now Fletton Parkway!

Oh! Spalding Road!
Spalding Road is the A16.

The A16 from Peterborough to Spalding subsided and was closed (if I remember correctly before it opened) until remedial work was completed. It starts in Paston Ward and travels through Northborough Ward in the Peterborough unitary authority area (governed by Peteborough City Council).

It then enters the Lincolnshire County Council & South Holland District Council areas where it travels through county & district wards: Crowland & Deeping St Nicholas, Moulton (Weston and Cowbit) and Spalding St Mary’s

It also passes through the following parishes:
Newborough, Borough Fen (Peterborough)
Crowland, Cowbit, Weston and Spalding South (South Holland, Lincolnshire)

It travels through two parliamentary constituencies: that of Peterborough Borough and South Holland and the Deepings.

The Fletton Parkway is the A1139

The roadworks which are currently underway and which have hit a £4.5M size brick are within the following areas of local government:

parliamentary constituency: North West Cambridgeshire
unitary authority area: Peterborough City Council
unitary authority wards: Orton Waterville, Orton Longueville and Orton with Hampton
parishes: Orton Waterville, Orton Longueville (and an unparished area)

Further reading

New Listerner

http://www.newlistener.co.uk/home/city-announces-massive-cost-overrun-on-infrastructure-project-due-to-unforeseen-circumstances

Peterborough Telegraph

 

30th January http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/news/politics/politics-news/contaminated-soil-and-new-works-land-city-council-with-4-5-million-roads-bill-1-6549612

2nd February http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/news/politics/politics-news/councillors-hit-back-at-mismanagement-claims-over-added-4-5-million-cost-to-fletton-parkway-widening-1-6556083

Was there a Clerk of Works?

Oh!  Again.  Check out the last frame!

To the best of my knowledge Clerk of Works is currently not a role within the organisation structure of Peterborough City Council (I can’t find the role on their website). Happy as always to be corrected.

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST – FOI-14-0299 A1139 Fletton Parkway

Although it looks from this document as if there were “site supervision and clerk of works functions” identified, it is clear that one contractor to the council appointed another contractor to the contractor to perform the roles. This is not the same as having one qualified person on one’s own team and begs the question who the possibly qualified person was. Happy as always to be corrected.

If Clerk of Works is the role which secures budgetary control (see above video), why isn’t Morson (the contractor apparently covering the role) picking up 100% of the £4.5M cost overrun?  One way to establish the reason for this would be to subject the relevant contracts and subcontracts to scrutiny by a person competent in law of contract.

Personally, if I were the council I’d bring the role of Clerk of Works straight back in-house to establish and secure a clear line of responsibility and management.  A good properly qualified person in this role could save the city a fortune over time.  I know that breathtaking achievements (even if you only count the beans) are often made, quietly and without a brass band, by people doing this sort of job for other organisations.

Information on the history of the role of Clerk of Works within Peterborough City Council’s remit very welcome.